Description

DreamMaker developed by Interinfo has a SQL Injection vulnerability. Authenticated remote attackers can inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database contents.

Executive Summary

Technical Details

Mitigations

References

Additional Metadata

{
  "score": "8.8",
  "pubDate": "2026-09-04T10:17:14.017Z",
  "pubdate": "2026-09-04T10:17:14.017Z",
  "executiveSummary": "Interinfo DreamMaker is susceptible to a critical SQL injection (SQLi) vulnerability, enabling authenticated remote attackers to compromise the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of the backend database.\nThe vulnerability originates from improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command within the application's data processing logic.\nBy injecting arbitrary SQL syntax into application inputs, an attacker can bypass security controls to execute unauthorized database queries.\nSuccessful exploitation grants an attacker the capability to perform unauthorized read, write, update, and delete operations on sensitive database records.\nThis vulnerability poses a significant risk to the organizational data posture, potentially leading to unauthorized data exfiltration, administrative privilege escalation, or total system compromise.\nExploitation requires the attacker to possess valid authentication credentials to interact with the vulnerable interface, after which the attack can be performed remotely via network-accessible application endpoints.",
  "technicalDetails": "The DreamMaker application suffers from an SQL injection vulnerability where user-supplied input is inadequately sanitized or parameterized before being concatenated into database queries.\nThe root cause of this vulnerability is the failure of the application's input validation layer to enforce strict typing or utilize parameterized queries (prepared statements), allowing malicious SQL fragments to be interpreted as executable commands by the database management system (DBMS).\nExploitation follows a structured methodology starting with the identification of input vectors, such as HTTP GET/POST parameters or header fields, that interface with backend database queries.\nAn authenticated attacker crafts a malicious payload containing SQL operators and functions (e.g., UNION SELECT, OR 1=1, or stacked queries) designed to manipulate the query logic.\nBy submitting these payloads, the attacker forces the DBMS to execute unintended operations, such as extracting the contents of sensitive tables, bypassing authentication mechanisms, or modifying application data structures.\nThe attack flow proceeds as follows: First, the attacker identifies a vulnerable entry point within the authenticated session. Second, the attacker tests the input field for character sensitivity to confirm the injection point. Third, the attacker injects structured payloads to map database schema, extract sensitive information, or escalate privileges.\nThe impact of a successful injection is severe; because the database interface processes these commands with the privilege level of the application's database user, the attacker can leverage the DBMS capabilities to read entire datasets, overwrite sensitive administrative configurations, or delete critical business information.\nFurthermore, depending on the underlying database configuration and the application's permissions, an attacker might be able to invoke system-level functions or read/write files on the filesystem, significantly expanding the scope of the compromise beyond the database layer."
}