Description

Dell PowerStore contains an Argument Injection vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to sensitive sensitive system information.

Executive Summary

Technical Details

Mitigations

References

Additional Metadata

{
  "score": "6.5",
  "pubDate": "2026-09-01T15:17:29.390Z",
  "pubdate": "2026-09-01T15:17:29.390Z",
  "executiveSummary": "An argument injection vulnerability has been identified in Dell PowerStore systems. This security flaw permits an authenticated user with limited privileges to manipulate command-line arguments, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive system information.\nThe vulnerability resides in the interface that processes user-supplied inputs, which fails to properly sanitize or validate arguments before passing them to system-level commands. An attacker with standard authenticated access can exploit this weakness to break out of intended operational constraints.\nThe primary impact involves the exposure of sensitive data, which could compromise the confidentiality and integrity of the storage environment. Successful exploitation requires an existing authenticated session, though the attacker does not need administrative rights, increasing the risk profile for organizations with insider threat concerns or compromised low-privilege accounts.\nDell PowerStore administrators should prioritize security patching once vendor-supplied updates are available and ensure that access control policies strictly adhere to the principle of least privilege to minimize the potential attack surface.",
  "technicalDetails": "The vulnerability is characterized as an argument injection flaw occurring within the backend processing logic of the Dell PowerStore management interface. This occurs when an application takes user-controllable input and utilizes it to construct a command string that is subsequently executed by the underlying operating system or shell environment. Because the system fails to perform sufficient input validation or employ proper command parameterization, a malicious actor can supply crafted input containing control characters, flags, or additional command arguments.\nThe attack flow commences with the attacker establishing a valid, authenticated session with the Dell PowerStore management interface. Once authenticated, the attacker identifies an input field or API endpoint that inadvertently passes user-provided data directly to a system binary or script without adequate sanitization. By injecting meta-characters (e.g., '-', '--', or shell metacharacters), the attacker can alter the intended execution flow of the underlying command.\nFor instance, if the backend script executes a command such as 'utility_tool --target [user_input]', an attacker could supply an argument designed to override or append malicious flags. This manipulation allows the attacker to execute the tool in a non-standard configuration that may reveal sensitive configuration data, internal path details, or credentials that would normally be obscured from a limited-privilege user.\nThe root cause is the improper handling of application-layer inputs where the boundary between data (user input) and instructions (command-line parameters) is blurred. By injecting specific flags, an attacker can coerce the targeted application to perform unintended read operations or disclose process-specific information that should remain restricted to higher-privilege administrative roles. The lack of strict allow-listing for command arguments enables the attacker to probe the system environment beyond the limitations initially defined by the application's intended functional scope.\nThe post-exploitation impact is significant, as the unauthorized information disclosure may facilitate further lateral movement or privilege escalation. By harvesting configuration details or sensitive system state information, the attacker can map the internal storage architecture, potentially identifying further vulnerabilities or data assets for subsequent exploitation phases."
}