Description

HCL MyXalytics was affected by Content Spoofing Vulnerability. It may allow an attacker to manipulate displayed content, making it appear as though it originates from a trusted source, potentially leading to phishing or data theft.

Executive Summary

Technical Details

Mitigations

References

Additional Metadata

{
  "score": "3.5",
  "pubDate": "2026-09-07T11:17:20.360Z",
  "pubdate": "2026-09-07T11:17:20.360Z",
  "executiveSummary": "HCL MyXalytics is susceptible to a content spoofing vulnerability, which permits unauthorized actors to manipulate the information rendered within the application's interface.\nBy leveraging this flaw, an attacker can deceive end-users by presenting fraudulent content that mimics legitimate, trusted communication or data.\nThe primary risk associated with this vulnerability includes phishing campaigns, social engineering attacks, and the potential theft of sensitive user data through fraudulent interface elements.\nThis vulnerability compromises the integrity of the application's visual output, allowing attackers to misrepresent the origin of information displayed to the user.\nExploitation does not necessarily require complex privileges, but it significantly undermines the trust model between the user and the application.\nOrganizations utilizing HCL MyXalytics should treat this as a high-priority security concern to prevent successful phishing or data exfiltration events.\nEffective mitigation requires strict validation of input parameters and appropriate sanitization of content rendered within the browser context to ensure that external, malicious, or unauthorized data cannot be injected into trusted segments of the user interface.",
  "technicalDetails": "The vulnerability resides in the way HCL MyXalytics processes and renders user-supplied input or external parameters before displaying them in the web interface.\nContent spoofing occurs when the application fails to adequately sanitize or validate input that is subsequently reflected in the document object model (DOM) without proper origin verification.\nThe root cause typically involves insufficient output encoding or the improper handling of URL parameters that control dynamic content generation.\nIn a standard attack flow, an attacker identifies a reflection point where the application renders input directly to the page. By crafting a malicious URL containing specific payloads, the attacker can force the application to display arbitrary text, modify hyperlinks, or present illegitimate forms.\nWhen an unsuspecting user accesses the crafted link, the application executes the logic that reflects the malicious input. Because the user perceives the content as originating from the trusted domain of the HCL MyXalytics instance, they are more likely to interact with fraudulent elements.\nExploitation allows for the injection of misleading messages, warnings, or interface elements that simulate system alerts, which can be leveraged to collect credentials or prompt the user to download malicious payloads.\nFrom a technical perspective, this flaw exploits the lack of content security policies (CSP) or improper scoping of the application's UI components, allowing the attacker to bypass the visual boundaries of legitimate content.\nThe vulnerability does not require authentication in instances where the reflection point is accessible via publicly reachable application endpoints. If the exploitation requires specific user context, an attacker would leverage social engineering to entice an authenticated session user to click the crafted link.\nPost-exploitation, the impact is primarily centered on the degradation of trust. The attacker effectively controls the client-side representation of data, which may facilitate further attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) if the spoofing vector is chained with improper script execution handling.\nThe persistence of the manipulated content depends on the duration of the user session or the visibility of the spoofed component within the application's dashboard architecture.\nWithout robust validation mechanisms, the application remains vulnerable to ongoing attempts to misrepresent its output, necessitating a fundamental review of the data flow from server-side ingestion to client-side presentation."
}